Efektivitas Penilaian Dinamis Berbantuan Google Form dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Teks Deskripsi

Astuti Astuti, Ida Nuraeni, Ulfah Ulfah, Syamsuddin Syamsuddin, Sukma Sukma

Abstract

This study aims to test the effectiveness of dynamic assessment assisted by Google Forms in learning to read descriptive texts for seventh-grade students. The research method used is a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group design. The research population consists of all seventh-grade students of SMPN 1 Wita Ponda, totaling 150 students, with a research sample of 66 students divided into 33 students in the experimental class and 33 students in the control class, selected using simple random sampling. Data collection techniques used a multiple-choice test consisting of 25 questions given in the pretest and posttest. Data analysis techniques used descriptive statistics and inferential statistics using t-test assisted by SPSS version 30. The results of the study showed that the experimental group experienced an increase in the average score from 70.58 in the pretest to 83.27 in the posttest, while the control group only increased from 65.03 to 72.30. The normality test in the experimental class obtained an index of 0.180>0.05 and in the control class obtained 0.131>0.05, therefore the data is normally distributed. The homogeneity of variance test on the posttest scores of the control class and the experimental class obtained a p-value of 0.680, where p is greater than 0.05, thus it is declared homogeneous. The hypothesis test results using inferential statistics stated that the research hypothesis was accepted because the p-value (2 tailed) was <0.001 and the t-count > t-table value (7.323 > 2.650), so it can be concluded that the hypothesis in this study is accepted. The research results prove that dynamic assessment assisted by Google Forms is effective in learning to read descriptive texts.

 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas penilaian dinamis berbantuan Google Form dalam pembelajaran membaca teks deskripsi pada siswa kelas VII. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi-experimental design dengan desain nonequivalent control group. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMPN 1 Wita Ponda sebanyak 150 siswa, dengan sampel penelitian sebanyak 66 siswa yang terbagi menjadi 33 siswa kelas eksperimen dan 33 siswa kelas kontrol yang dipilih menggunakan teknik simple random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes pilihan ganda sebanyak 25 butir soal yang diberikan pada pretest dan posttest. Teknik analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferensial uji-t dengan bantuan SPSS versi 30. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelompok eksperimen mengalami peningkatan nilai rata-rata dari 70,58 pada pretest menjadi 83,27 pada posttest, sedangkan kelompok kontrol hanya meningkat dari 65,03 menjadi 72,30. Uji normalitas pada kelas eksperimen diperoleh indeks sebesar 0,180>0,05 dan kelas kontrol diperoleh 0,131>0,05, maka data berdistribusi normal. Hasil uji homogenitas variansi dari nilai posttest kelas kontrol dan kelas eksperimen diperoleh nilai p=0,680 dimana p lebih besar dari 0,05 sehingga dinyatakan homogen. Hasil uji hipotesis dengan statistik inferensial dinyatakan bahwa hipotesis penelitian diterima karena p-value (2 tailed) adalah <0,001 dan nilai thitung>nilai ttabel (7,323 > 2,650), sehingga dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa hipotesis dalam penelitian ini diterima. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa penilaian dinamis berbantuan google form efektif dalam pembelajaran membaca teks deskripsi.

Keywords

dynamic assessment; Google Forms; reading descriptive text; Indonesian language learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afandi, A., & Badarudin, B. (2019). Peningkatan kemampuan membaca pemahaman melalui strategi survey, question, read, recite, review (SQ3R) pada siswa SMP. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 150-165. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v5i2.9983

Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (2019). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 37-55). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524513.006

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Aydin, S. (2020). The use of Google Forms in EFL assessment. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.762034

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio Books.

Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-115). Guilford Press.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Davin, K. J. (2016). Classroom dynamic assessment: A critical examination of constructs and practices. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 813-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12352

Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54(2), 207-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395471

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25-S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: The new psychology of success (Updated ed.). Random House.

Earl, L. M. (2021). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (3rd ed.). Corwin Press.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Handiani, M. P. (2025). Pembelajaran memahami teks deskripsi dengan modul ajar dan asesmen berbasis digital di SMPN 2 Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 13(1), 78-92.

Hasson, N., & Joffe, V. (2017). The case for dynamic assessment in speech and language therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 33(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659016668218

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2019). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2017). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607516

Heritage, M. (2013). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press.

Hidayat, R., & Prasetyo, A. (2021). Pemanfaatan Google Form dalam pembelajaran daring. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 12(2), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v12i2.18562

Julistriana, T., Mulyani, S., & Priyanto, A. (2023). Pengaruh penggunaan media Google Form pada materi teks rekon bahasa Indonesia di SMA Negeri 1 Bayah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 11(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v11i1.5673

Kemdikbud. (2017). Buku guru bahasa Indonesia SMP/MTs kelas VII. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2017). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209-226). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch12

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2019). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology (pp. 1-24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_15-1

Kozulin, A., & Presseisen, B. Z. (1995). Mediated learning experience and psychological tools: Vygotsky's and Feuerstein's perspectives in a study of student learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3002_3

Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850

Mahsun. (2014). Teks dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia kurikulum 2013. Rajawali Pers.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2021). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Nuraisyah, S. (2020). Penggunaan multimedia interaktif dalam pembelajaran menyimak teks deskripsi. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(3), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.24036/jbsi.v9i3.108945

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452

Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687

Poehner, M. E. (2016). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of assessment and instruction. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 252-268). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624747

Poehner, M. E. (2018). Mediated development: A Vygotskian approach to transforming second language learner abilities. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x

Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935

Popa, N. L., & Pˇauc, R. L. (2015). Dynamic assessment: A new approach in educational evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1283-1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.264

Rahmawati, D. (2021). Efektivitas Google Form dalam penilaian formatif siswa SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(4), 234-247. https://doi.org/10.31949/jip.v7i4.2156

Raman, A., & Sairam, B. (2021). Online assessment: A tool to enhance teaching learning process. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 8(1), 223-229.

Rubin, D. (2011). Diagnosis and correction in reading instruction (5th ed.). Pearson.

Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). The application of differentiated instruction in postsecondary environments: Benefits, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 307-323.

Santoso, H. B., Schrepp, M., Isal, R. Y. K., Utomo, A. Y., & Priyogi, B. (2020). Measuring user experience of the student-centered e-learning environment. Journal of Educators Online, 13(1), 58-79. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2016.1.5

Sari, D. P., & Prasetyo, B. (2022). Desain penilaian dinamis dalam pembelajaran teks deskripsi di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 10(2), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v10i2.45678

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.

Shepard, L. A. (2019). Classroom assessment to support teaching and learning. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843818

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Situngkir, A., Saragih, S., & Napitupulu, E. (2023). Penilaian dinamis pada kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.1.12345

Stanovich, K. E. (2018). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189(1-2), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-204

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2020). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529658

Stiggins, R. J., & Chappuis, J. (2017). An introduction to student-involved assessment FOR learning (7th ed.). Pearson.

Sulianta, F. (2020). Literasi digital, riset, dan perkembangannya di Indonesia. Informatika.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2019). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Ulfa, M., Nuraeni, I., & Ulfah. (2023). Pengembangan bahan ajar bahasa Indonesia berbasis mitigasi bencana untuk sekolah menengah pertama di Kota Palu. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.567

Ventayen, R. J. M., Estira, K. L. A., De Guzman, M. J., Cabaluna, C. M., & Espinosa, N. N. (2018). Usability evaluation of Google Forms as an assessment tool in eLearning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 400-416. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3813

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wiana, W., & Nuraeni, I. (2024). Penerapan metode problem solving dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi membaca teks persuasi pada peserta didik kelas VIII A SMP Negeri 15 Palu. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 7(3), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v7i3.978

Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2020). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v37i2.4919.578-589

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.