3.png){kind=logo}
Penggunaan Logika Proposisional dalam Analisis Makna Kalimat: Kajian Interdisipliner Matematika dan Linguistik
Abstract
Analyzing the meaning of sentences in natural language presents a significant challenge due to its often ambiguous and complex nature. This research addresses this issue by introducing the potential of propositional logic as a formal analytical tool, highlighting the need for an interdisciplinary approach that integrates mathematics and linguistics. The aim of this article is to thoroughly examine the application of propositional logic in sentence meaning analysis, explore the interdisciplinary relationship between these two fields, and identify the strengths and limitations of this approach. The research method employed is a qualitative-analytical literature study, reviewing primary and secondary literature from the fields of logic, linguistics, and philosophy of language through literature documentation for data collection and descriptive-critical content analysis for data analysis. The results indicate that propositional logic can represent the logical structure of sentences and formally analyze truth conditions. Its main advantages lie in the precision and formality it offers, yet limitations exist in handling aspects of quantification, modality, and pragmatics of natural language. The synergy between mathematics and linguistics, particularly through formal semantics and mathematical linguistics, proves to make a significant contribution to enriching sentence meaning analysis in a more comprehensive and profound manner.
Abstrak
Analisis makna kalimat dalam bahasa alami merupakan tantangan signifikan mengingat sifatnya yang seringkali ambigu dan kompleks. Penelitian ini mengkaji permasalahan tersebut dengan memperkenalkan potensi logika proposisional sebagai alat analisis formal, serta menyoroti kebutuhan akan pendekatan interdisipliner yang mengintegrasikan matematika dan linguistik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji secara mendalam aplikasi logika proposisional dalam analisis makna kalimat, mengeksplorasi hubungan interdisipliner antara kedua bidang ilmu tersebut, serta mengidentifikasi keunggulan dan keterbatasan pendekatan ini. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka kualitatif-analitis, dengan mengkaji literatur primer dan sekunder dari bidang logika, linguistik, dan filsafat bahasa melalui teknik pengumpulan data dokumentasi kepustakaan dan teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis isi deskriptif-kritis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa logika proposisional mampu merepresentasikan struktur logis kalimat dan menganalisis kondisi kebenaran secara formal. Keunggulan utamanya terletak pada presisi dan formalitas yang ditawarkan, namun terdapat keterbatasan dalam menangani aspek kuantifikasi, modalitas, dan pragmatik bahasa alami. Sinergi antara matematika dan linguistik, khususnya melalui semantik formal dan linguistik matematika, terbukti memberikan kontribusi penting dalam memperkaya analisis makna kalimat secara lebih komprehensif dan mendalam.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Admojo, F. T. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on Ontology-based Indonesian Question Answering System. Knowledge Engineering and Data Science, 6(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.17977/um018v6i22023p129-144
Aji, A. B., Istikhomah, E., Al Majid, M. Z. Y., & Ulya, C. (2021). Analisis kesalahan berbahasa tataran semantik pada berita daring laman sindonews.com. Jurnal Genre (Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya), 2(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.26555/jg.v2i2.3290
Al-Odhari, A. M. (2021). Features of propositional logic. Pure Mathematical Sciences, 10(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.12988/pms.2021.91275
Baggio, G. (2021). Compositionality in a Parallel Architecture for Language Processing. Cognitive Science A Multidisciplinary Journal, 45(7491), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12949
Baratgin, J., Politzer, G., Over, D. E., Takahashi, T., & Niall, K. K. (2018). The Psychology of Uncertainty and Three-Valued Truth Tables. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01479
Bilanová, Z., Perháč, J., Chovancová, E., & Chovanec, M. (2020). Logic analysis of natural language based on predicate linear logic. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(6), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.17.6.2020.6.14
Bolibekova, M. M., Abdurakhimova, N. A., Toshtemirova, A. S., & Abduqakharov, Q. A. (2022). Philosophical and methodological bases of cut and sentence interpretation in formal linguistics. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 512–528. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6ns2.2170
Choe, D. K., & McClosky, D. (2015). Parsing paraphrases with joint inference. ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference, 1, 1223–1233. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p15-1118
Duffley, P. (2021). Logical Form – Not logical enough for logic, not linguistic enough for linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 182, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.019
Dumitru, M. (2025). Representations , Models , and Rules. Topoi, July. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-025-10242-z
Emets, T. V., Baryshnikova, I. V., Trutnev, A. Y., Suvorova, E. V., & Akhmetzyanova, T. L. (2018). Logical and linguistic strategies for translating complex sentences in literary texts of natural languages. XLinguae, 11(2), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.01
Fortuny, J. (2024). Jordi Fortuny. Studia Linguistica, 78(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12221
Groote, P. De. (2015). Modularity and compositionality : The case of temporal modifiers. Proceedings of SALT 25, 656–675. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3076
Hassan, S. A. (2016). The Use of Logic in Contemporary Islamic Discourses. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(5), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n5p171
Herzig, J., Nowak, P. K., Thomas, M., Piccinno, F., & Eisenschlos, J. M. (2020). T A P AS : Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-training. 4320–4333. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.398
Hogeweg, L., & Vicente, A. (2020). On the nature of the lexicon : The status of rich. Journal Linguistics, 56(56), 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000316
Hupkes, D., Dankers, V., & Bruni, E. (2020). Compositionality Decomposed : How do Neural Networks Generalise ? Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 67, 757–795. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11674
Jaszczolt, K. M. (2021). Functional proposition: A new concept for representing discourse meaning? Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.010
Jomaa, N. J., & Bidin, S. J. (2019). Reporting and quoting: Functional analyses of logico-semantic relations of clause complex citations. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(1), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2501-12
Khoo, J., & Mandelkern, M. (2018). Triviality Results and the Relationship between Logical and Natural Languages. Mind, 128(510), 485–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzy006
Kusmanto, J. ., & Pulungan, A. H. (2023). the Meaningfulness of Linguistic Expressions From the Truth-Conditional Theory of Meaning (a Metalingual Syudy). Linguistik Terapan, 19(3), 167. https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v19i3.42049
Lenzen, W., Maccoll, H., Ramsey, F. P., & Everett, J. (2022). Rewriting the History of Connexive Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, September 2021, 525–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09640-6
Mwakapina, J. W. (2021). What is the Nature of Language? How does it Behave? What is Language Learning then? A Review Paper in Applied Linguistics. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 2(4), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v2i4.357
Ngansop, J. N. (2018). Relevance of Learning Logical Analysis of Mathematical Statements. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_25
Orlando, E., & Saab, A. (2020). A Stereotype Semantics for Syntactically Ambiguous Slurs. Analytic Philosophy, 61(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12184
Oxley, A. (2010). Discrete mathematics and its applications. In Teaching Mathematics and its Applications (Vol. 29, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrq007
Pirozelli, P., & Camara, I. (2022). Natural Language at A Crossroads : Formal and Probabilistic Approaches In Philosophy. Manuscrito – Rev. Int. Fil. Campinas, 45(n.2), 50–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2022.V45N2.PI
Quelhas, A. C. (2017). A Priori True and False Conditionals. Cognitive Science A Multidisciplinary Journal, 41, 1003–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12479
Quigley, D. (2025). A Vector Logic for Extensional Formal Semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 34(5), 557–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-025-09443-x
Reddy, S., Collins, M., Kwiatkowski, T., Das, D., Steedman, M., & Lapata, M. (2016). Transforming Dependency Structures to Logical Forms for Semantic Parsing. 4, 127–140. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00088
Singh, O. P., & Pawar, S. (2021). Natural Language Semantic to Formal Language Semantic. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, 8(6), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.17148/IARJSET.2021.8639
Tampubolon, J. K., & Santosa, R. G. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Flores. JUPIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Flores, 8(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.37478/jupika.v8i1.5368
Tsujii, J. (2021). Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00420
Wurm, C. (2021). Reasoning with Ambiguity. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 30(1), 139–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-020-09324-5
Yaseen, M. S. (2025). Modeling Sentence Meaning Using Linear Operators in a Vector Space Semantics Framework : An Interdisciplinary Approach. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 07(05), 891–898. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.9553
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
