3.png){kind=logo}
Expert Judgements of Integrated Cyberpragmatics Learning Model with Socio-Semiotics Multimodality-Based Cybertext Contexts
Abstract
This research is driven by an increasingly urgent requirement to fuse cyberpragmatics instruction with research findings on cyber texts within a multimodal environment, particularly in the ongoing postCovid-19 pandemic era. The challenge presented by this research problem is addressed through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The research framework adopted is the Research & Development model proposed by Borg & Gall. The results indicate that 7.69% of participants found it appropriate for use without any changes, 92.30% found it suitable for use with revisions based on notes, and 0% of participants deemed it unsuitable for use. Thus, it can be inferred that all participants unanimously agreed that the book product of the cyberpragmatics learning model, combined with research on cybertext context, is suitable for use with revisions based on notes. This research has yielded foundational insights into the viability of employing cyberpragmatics learning models as a result of applied research.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini didorong oleh kebutuhan yang semakin mendesak untuk memadukan pengajaran cyberpragmatics dengan temuan penelitian mengenai teks siber dalam lingkungan multimoda, khususnya di era pandemi pasca-Covid-19 yang sedang berlangsung. Tantangan yang dihadirkan oleh masalah penelitian ini di atasi melalui kombinasi metodologi kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Kerangka penelitian yang diadopsi adalah model Research & Development yang dikemukakan oleh Borg & Gall. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 7,69% peserta merasa layak digunakan tanpa ada perubahan, 92,30% merasa layak digunakan dengan revisi berdasarkan catatan, dan 0% peserta menilai tidak layak pakai. Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa seluruh peserta sepakat bahwa produk buku model pembelajaran cyberpragmatics yang dipadukan dengan penelitian konteks cybertext layak digunakan dengan revisi berdasarkan catatan. Penelitian ini telah menghasilkan wawasan mendasar mengenai kelayakan penggunaan model pembelajaran cyberpragmatics sebagai hasil penelitian terapan.
Keywords
Full Text:
pdfReferences
Aijmer, K. (2009). Corpus and Context. Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.06aij
Al-Qahtani, A. A. (2020). Teaching Pragmatic Competence in EFL Context: The Case of Saudi EFL Teachers. Asian EFL Journal, 27(41).
Barbulet, G. (2013). Social Media- A pragmatic Approach: Contexts & Implicatures. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.083
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996). Pragmatics and Language Teaching: Bringing Pragmatics and Pedagogy together. Pragmatics and Language Learning. Monograph Series Vol. 7.
Bezemer, J., & Jewitt, C. (2018). Multimodality: A guide for linguists. Research Methods in Linguistics (2nd Edition). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350043466.ch-012
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. In Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A Social Semiotic Frame. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687537
Budijanto, J. B., Setyaningsih, Y., & Rahardi, R. K. (2022). Urgensi pengembangan bahan ajar morfologi kontekstual berbasis multimodalitas. Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v18i1.4837
Díaz-Pérez, F. J. (2013). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context by Francisco Yus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6250-3_14
Elliott, J. C. (2015). A review of Teaching Models: Designing Instruction for 21st Century Learners. In
Education Review // Reseñas Educativas (Vol. 22). https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v22.1865
Farashaiyan, A., Tan, K. H., Muthusamy, P., & Sahragard, R. (2017). The praxis of interlanguage pragmatics instruction in an EFL context. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 23(4).
https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-08
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2006). Identifying a Research Problem, Question and Searching. Educational Research: An Introduction.
Grundy, P. (2012). Teaching and Learning Pragmatics. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr070
Huang, F. (2022). Multimedia Wireless-Network-Based Model for Smart Interactive Translation Teaching. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1940432
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. In Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034
Kress, G. (2015). Semiotic work: Applied Linguistics and a social semiotic account of Multimodality. AILA Review, 28. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.03kre
Kunjana Rahardi, R. (2020). Building critical awareness of corona virus-related news: Cyber-pragmatic study of COVID-19 hoaxes on social media. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology.
Kurniawati, W., Ekoyanantiasih, R., Yulianti, S., Hardaniawati, M., Sasangka, S. W., & Firdaus, W. (2022). Kekuasaan Semantik dalam Analisis Wacana Kritis Debat Capres-Cawapres. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1), 165-179.
Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2019). Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1468789
Locher, M. A. (2013a). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002
Locher, M. A. (2013b). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002
Loh, J., & Walsh, M. J. (2021). Social Media Context Collapse: The Consequential Differences Between Context Collusion Versus Context Collision. Social Media and Society, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211041646
Mehawesh, M. I. (2014). The Socio-Semiotic Theory of Language and Translation: An overview. International Journal of Languages and Literatures, 2(2).
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. In International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447
Orsini-Jones, M. E., Lloyd, E., Cribb, M., Lee, F., Bescond, G., Ennagadi, A., & García, B. I. (2017). The Trouble with Cyberpragmatics. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2017010104
Rahardi, K. (2019). Contexts as The Determining Roles of Javanese Phatic ‘Monggo’: Culture-Specific Pragmatics Perspective. Indonesian Language Education and Literature. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v5i1.5035
Rahardi, K. (2020). Mendeskripsi Peran Konteks Pragmatik: Menuju Perspektif Cyberpragmatics. In Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra. https://doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v3i2.2333
Rahardi, R. K. (2020a). Building Critical Awareness of Corona Virus-Related News: Cyber-Pragmatic Study of Covid-19 Hoaxes on Social Media. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6).
Rahardi, R. K. (2020b). Konteks dalam perspektif cyberpragmatics. 2, 151–163.
https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v38i2.132
Rahardi, R. K. (2020c). Mendeskripsikan Makna Pragmatik Hoaks Covid-19 dalam Media Sosial: Perspektif Cyber-Pragmatik. Jurnal Kata, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v19i3.31469
Rahardi, R. K. (2022a). Metafungsi Interpersonal Siberteks Vaksinasi Covid-19: Perspektif Multimodalitas. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v11i1.4196
Rahardi, R. K. (2022b). Triadicities of Indonesian Phatic Functions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(12), 2641–2650. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1212.22
Setyaningsih, Y., Rahardi, R., Dewi, R., & Nugraha, D. (2020). Reflective Model of Teaching Indonesian for Foreign Speakers Integrated with Pragmatic Contexts. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.9-11-2019.2295095
Shin, Y. S., Masís-Obando, R., Keshavarzian, N., Dáve, R., & Norman, K. A. (2021). Context-dependent memory effects in two immersive virtual reality environments: On Mars and underwater. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01835-3
Smith, J., Bekker, H., & Cheater, F. (2011). Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.39.c8283
Tinits, P., Nölle, J., & Hartmann, S. (2017). Usage context influences the evolution of overspecification in iterated learning. Journal of Language Evolution, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzx011
Widdowson, H. G. (2006). Context, Community, and Authentic Language. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588001
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics, Internet-mediated communication in context (A. Fetzer, Ed.; 1st ed.). John Benjamin Publishing Company. https://benjamins.com https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213
Yus, F. (2019). Internet pragmatics and the future. Internet Pragmatics, 2(1).
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00022.yus
Yus, F. (2021a). Pragmatics, humour and the internet. Internet Pragmatics, 4(1).
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00067.yus
Yus, F. (2021b). Relevance theory, internet pragmatics, and cyberpragmatics. In Smartphone Communication. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003200574-3
Zagalo, N. (2019). Multimodality and expressivity in videogames. Observatorio, 13(1).
https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS13120191411
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
